telling
the
truth.com
Internet researchers have uncovered an Associated Press article in the archives of the Danbury, Connecticut News-Times about methyl bromide applications near Amesti school in Watsonville, CA. from Dec. 1, 1997
 
December 1, 1997
Deadly pesticide next to Amesti Elementary School divides community
 

By RICHARD COLE
Associated Press Writer

WATSONVILLE, Calif. (AP) - Just over the fence from Amesti Elementary School on California's Central Coast, strawberries and raspberries thrive on some of the world's most fertile farmland.

But when ominous warning signs go up, and plastic tarpaulins cover the rich earth, the children at Amesti don't chase errant soccer balls onto that field.


Photo Caption

A sign warns of methyl bromide application on a strawberry field near Amesti Elementary School in Watsonville, Calif., Oct. 10, 1997. Teachers and parents at the school are concerned that the pesticide, which was applied as close as 300 yards to the school grounds, is making the children and teachers sick. (AP Photo/Thor Swift)


Fall is the season for methyl bromide, a highly effective but controversial pesticide - and the latest battleground between chemical-dependent agriculture and urban sprawl. Fall is also the season, say many of Amesti's teachers and parents, for a rash of strange ailments that have plagued the school for years.

"They are hard to pinpoint because they are flulike symptoms, or they are headaches, or they are nosebleeds, or things that could be anything," says second-grade teacher Corinne Walcott. "When there are methyl bromide applications, children and teachers have experienced things like numbness in their faces for as long as several weeks."

For years, teachers considered the illnesses isolated problems, a normal part of the school experience. Then they looked at the symptoms of methyl bromide poisoning. Alarm bells rang.

Blurred vision. Weakness. Dizziness. Nosebleeds. Headaches. And in more severe cases, pneumonia, paralysis, heart problems, fetal damage and ultimately death.

My portable (classroom) is right by these raspberry fields,'' says second-grade teacher Karen Kite. "The wind comes directly from the field right into my windows. Some day I would like to have a choice to start a family, but these things are reproductive poisons."

When the school year started — along with the pesticide applications — the teachers decided they'd had enough. They talked to equally alarmed parents. The group approached the Santa Cruz County agricultural commissioner and asked for a hearing. A scheduled Sept. 20 application was delayed, but ultimately state and local authorities gave the go ahead. On Sept. 27, grower Will Garrouette began injecting methyl bromide into the field next to Amesti.

And on Sept. 27, about 270 of the school's 650 students stayed home. In subsequent applications, the number of absences dropped to around 100. Jim and Lorraine Scott-Behrends, with three children at Amesti, helped organize parents.

If people are getting sick at this school, my bottom line is that I am putting my children at risk here,'' Jim says. ``Methyl bromide is a neurotoxin. We don't know the effect, especially with a child, of a long-term exposure for six hours a day.

The boycott angered school officials. They lost money — tens of thousands of dollars — in state reimbursement because of the absences. They felt that teachers were fanning unfounded hysteria in children and parents.

"It's what it does to the kids," says Terry McHenry, assistant superintendent of the Pajaro Valley Unified School District. "They're scaring kids about being outside. They're scaring them about coming to school."

The real issue, McHenry says, is an increasingly urban population uneasy with rural lifestyles.

"You look at this county — half of it is covered with strawberries and other crops," he says. "They're saying you can't live in a farm community."

What testing has been done shows no exposure above California's maximum level of 210 parts per billion, officials say. A test of Amesti teachers after an Oct. 18 spraying found normal levels of methyl bromide in their bloodstream, say Santa Cruz County health officials. The farmer using methyl bromide dismisses the concern of parents and teachers. "We've worked around it all of our lives," Garrouette says. "It's not nearly as bad as everyone thinks."

Led by Gov. Pete Wilson, the state has continually fought efforts to ban or further restrict methyl bromide. The governor has said a ban could cost the state 10,000 jobs and nearly $350 million in crop losses.

But the pesticide can be lethal if misused. At least 15 deaths have been attributed to methyl bromide since 1982, all involving fumigated buildings. The state finally banned such use.

The United Farm Workers union has conducted a battle against the pesticide, which it fears is poisoning workers sent into the fields.

More than 800 elementary schools and licensed day care centers are located within a mile and a half of fields where methyl bromide is used," says Marc Grossman, a UFW official. "And pesticide enforcement is a joke in California."

California Department of Pesticide Regulation officials bristle at that charge. Where's the proof, they ask. Levels of methyl bromide found around Amesti, for instance, were at the 50 to 70 ppb, well under the state standard.

"We find it difficult to believe there are illnesses at those levels,'' says DPR spokeswoman Veda Federighi.

Lorraine Scott-Behrends says no existing studies show what will happen to humans, especially children, after long-term exposure to methyl bromide.

"The tobacco industry will still tell you that cigarette smoking won't kill you. And how long did they tell us DDT was safe?," she says. "Just because they're saying methyl bromide is safe, I'm not willing to test that with my children's health."

Methyl bromide production in the United States is banned as of 2001 under an international treaty — because of the gas's effect on the world's ozone layer. But methyl bromide critics fear that existing stocks will continue to be used for years — and that chemical companies will find a loophole or a way to delay the ban.

In the field next to Amesti, farm supervisor Jaime Hernandez sees the issue in simple terms.

"If you don't use the bromide, there's no harvest. And then there's no work," he says.

In a car outside the school, where he waits for his two little sisters, Eisbain Herrera also sees the issue in simple — but opposite — terms.

"Not with a lot of little kids around," Herrera says, shaking his head. "I don't think it's safe."


See also:
March 28, 2001 Resolution of the P.V.U.S.D. regarding Methyl Bromide and schools
March 21, 2001 Protest and Demonstration at P.V.U.S.D. district offices

HOME